Which is better, INSP or PME.AX?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) currently grades higher than INSP — 78/100 (B grade) vs 46/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — INSP wins on none; PME.AX wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy INSP or PME.AX?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both INSP and PME.AX are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is INSP better than PME.AX for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, PME.AX currently grades higher — 78/100 vs 46/100, a 32-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between INSP and PME.AX on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). INSP currently scores 46/100 (D grade); PME.AX scores 78/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, INSP or PME.AX?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. INSP and PME.AX are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, INSP or PME.AX?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are INSP and PME.AX both Healthcare stocks?

Yes — both Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) operate in the Healthcare sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this INSP vs PME.AX comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Inspire Medical Systems

INSP$1.44BHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Pro Medicus Limited

PME.AX$16.79BHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Pro Medicus Limited

INSP 07 PME.AX

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

INSP0wins

7winsPME.AX

Warren Buffett

46D

B78

Benjamin Graham

33F

A90

Philip Fisher

44F

A98

Peter Lynch

67C

A100

Joel Greenblatt

45D

B84

Charlie Munger

28F

A91

Terry Smith

29F

A96

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	INSP	PME.AX
Market cap	$1.44B	$16.79B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 9.1x	147.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 22.0x	106.8x
ROIC (TTM)	6.24%	42.56% Winner
Gross margin	85.78%	99.85% Winner
Net margin	14.33%	54.12% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 40.6%	31.61%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	37.34%
Debt / Equity	0.0x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

INSP leads on

P/E (TTM)9.1xvs 147.6x+94%
EV/EBIT22.0xvs 106.8x+79%
Revenue CAGR 5y40.6%vs 31.61%+22%

PME.AX leads on

Market cap$16.79Bvs $1.44B+91%
ROIC (TTM)42.56%vs 6.24%+85%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.0x+76%
Net margin54.12%vs 14.33%+74%

More like INSP

INSP vs 1681.HK INSP vs SANOFICONR.NS INSP vs SANOFICONR.BO INSP vs CAMX.ST

More like PME.AX

PME.AX vs 1681.HK PME.AX vs SANOFICONR.NS PME.AX vs SANOFICONR.BO PME.AX vs CAMX.ST

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for INSP Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PME.AX

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Inspire Medical Systems

INSP$1.44BHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Pro Medicus Limited

PME.AX$16.79BHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Pro Medicus Limited

INSP 07 PME.AX

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

INSP0wins

7winsPME.AX

Warren Buffett

46D

B78

Benjamin Graham

33F

A90

Philip Fisher

44F

A98

Peter Lynch

67C

A100

Joel Greenblatt

45D

B84

Charlie Munger

28F

A91

Terry Smith

29F

A96

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	INSP	PME.AX
Market cap	$1.44B	$16.79B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 9.1x	147.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 22.0x	106.8x
ROIC (TTM)	6.24%	42.56% Winner
Gross margin	85.78%	99.85% Winner
Net margin	14.33%	54.12% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 40.6%	31.61%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	37.34%
Debt / Equity	0.0x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

INSP leads on

P/E (TTM)9.1xvs 147.6x+94%
EV/EBIT22.0xvs 106.8x+79%
Revenue CAGR 5y40.6%vs 31.61%+22%

PME.AX leads on

Market cap$16.79Bvs $1.44B+91%
ROIC (TTM)42.56%vs 6.24%+85%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.0x+76%
Net margin54.12%vs 14.33%+74%

More like INSP

INSP vs 1681.HK INSP vs SANOFICONR.NS INSP vs SANOFICONR.BO INSP vs CAMX.ST

More like PME.AX

PME.AX vs 1681.HK PME.AX vs SANOFICONR.NS PME.AX vs SANOFICONR.BO PME.AX vs CAMX.ST

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for INSP Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PME.AX

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.