Stock comparison
Hamilton Lane
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
Market cap
$5.02B
Sector
Financials
JFR
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund
Market cap
$1.02B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Hamilton Lane HLNE
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HLNE | JFR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76C | 34F | HLNE |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 21F | HLNE |
| Philip Fisher | 77C | 50C | HLNE |
| Peter Lynch | 53C | 40D | HLNE |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 26F | HLNE |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 49D | HLNE |
| Terry Smith | 76B | 41D | HLNE |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HLNE | JFR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.02B | $1.02B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.1x | 15.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 15.7x | 11.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 14.52% | 5.51% |
| Gross margin | 69.23% | 111.92% |
| Net margin | 30.59% | 55.64% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.19% | 17.36% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 17.91% | -19.91% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 13.35% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HLNE leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y17.91%vs -19.91%+190%
- Market cap$5.02Bvs $1.02B+80%
- ROIC (TTM)14.52%vs 5.51%+62%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 0.6x+30%
JFR leads on
- Dividend yield13.35%vs 2.44%+82%
- Net margin55.64%vs 30.59%+45%
- Gross margin111.92%vs 69.23%+38%
- EV/EBIT11.7xvs 15.7x+25%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.