Stock comparison
Lam Research
Magic Software Enterprises
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
LRCX
Lam Research
Market cap
$381.86B
Sector
Technology
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
Market cap
$853.35M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Lam Research LRCX
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | LRCX | MGIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 51C | LRCX |
| Benjamin Graham | 88A | 62C | LRCX |
| Philip Fisher | 76B | 35D | LRCX |
| Peter Lynch | 69B | 45D | LRCX |
| Joel Greenblatt | 84C | 29F | LRCX |
| Charlie Munger | 86A | 31F | LRCX |
| Terry Smith | 88A | 33F | LRCX |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LRCX | MGIC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $381.86B | $853.35M |
| P/E (TTM) | 55.4x | 21.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 62.9x | 13.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 42.79% | 12.82% |
| Gross margin | 49.98% | 28.04% |
| Net margin | 30.94% | 6.64% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.96% | 10.46% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 11.27% | 11.23% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 2.57% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
LRCX leads on
- Market cap$381.86Bvs $853.35M+100%
- Net margin30.94%vs 6.64%+79%
- ROIC (TTM)42.79%vs 12.82%+70%
- Gross margin49.98%vs 28.04%+44%
MGIC leads on
- Dividend yield2.57%vs 0.34%+87%
- EV/EBIT13.8xvs 62.9x+78%
- P/E (TTM)21.3xvs 55.4x+62%
- Revenue CAGR 5y10.46%vs 5.96%+43%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.