Which is better, AZA.ST or LSEG.L?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ) (AZA.ST) currently grades higher than LSEG.L — 58/100 (C grade) vs 50/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AZA.ST wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; LSEG.L wins on Peter Lynch and Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AZA.ST or LSEG.L?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AZA.ST and LSEG.L are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AZA.ST better than LSEG.L for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, AZA.ST currently grades higher — 58/100 vs 50/100, a 8-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AZA.ST and LSEG.L on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AZA.ST currently scores 58/100 (C grade); LSEG.L scores 50/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AZA.ST or LSEG.L?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AZA.ST and LSEG.L are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AZA.ST or LSEG.L?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AZA.ST and LSEG.L both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ) (AZA.ST) and London Stock Exchange Group plc (LSEG.L) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AZA.ST vs LSEG.L comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

AZA.ST$60.64BFinancials Market cap, Sector

London Stock Exchange Group

LSEG.L$41.72BFinancials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

AZA.ST 52 LSEG.L

Fit scores by strategy

AZA.ST5wins

2winsLSEG.L

Warren Buffett

58D

D50

Benjamin Graham

64C

C63

Philip Fisher

65C

D45

Peter Lynch

48D

D51

Joel Greenblatt

34F

F35

Charlie Munger

68C

D45

Terry Smith

78B

D46

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AZA.ST	LSEG.L
Market cap	Winner: $60.64B	$41.72B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 21.1x	35.3x
EV/EBIT	-	23.2x
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AZA.ST leads on

EPS CAGR 5y16.06%vs 0.62%+96%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.6x+92%
Net margin58.56%vs 13.36%+77%
Revenue CAGR 5y14.76%vs 6.47%+56%

LSEG.L leads on

More like AZA.ST

AZA.ST vs FBK.MI AZA.ST vs IBKD.SI AZA.ST vs CPI.JO AZA.ST vs BGN.MI

More like LSEG.L

LSEG.L vs FBK.MI LSEG.L vs IBKD.SI

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

London Stock Exchange Group

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like AZA.ST

More like LSEG.L

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis