Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Lyft
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$345.34B
Sector
Technology
LYFT
Lyft
Market cap
$5.28B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | LYFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 38D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 24F | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 47D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 68C | LYFT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 100A | LYFT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 36D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 31F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $345.34B | $5.28B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 1.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 2.75% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 43.24% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 43.82% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 18.45% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$345.34Bvs $5.28B+98%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.4x+35%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 43.24%+12%
LYFT leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.0x+167%
- P/E (TTM)1.8xvs 40.0x+96%
- ROIC (TTM)2.75%vs 21.6%+92%
- Revenue CAGR 5y18.45%vs 5.31%+71%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.