Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Manhattan Associates
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
MANH
Manhattan Associates
Market cap
$7.77B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Manhattan Associates MANH
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | MANH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 69B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 76B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 79B | MANH |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 65B | Tie |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 87A | MANH |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 81A | MANH |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 84A | MANH |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $7.77B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 36.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 26.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 76.84% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 55.56% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 19.68% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 12.98% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 20.26% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $7.77B+98%
- Net margin29.31%vs 19.68%+33%
MANH leads on
- ROIC (TTM)76.84%vs 21.6%+72%
- EPS CAGR 5y20.26%vs 7.72%+62%
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.98%vs 5.31%+59%
- EV/EBIT26.9xvs 41.8x+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.