Which is better, EMR.AX or MATV?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Emerald Resources NL (EMR.AX) currently grades higher than MATV — 79/100 (C grade) vs 39/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — EMR.AX wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; MATV wins on Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy EMR.AX or MATV?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both EMR.AX and MATV are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is EMR.AX better than MATV for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, EMR.AX currently grades higher — 79/100 vs 39/100, a 40-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between EMR.AX and MATV on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). EMR.AX currently scores 79/100 (C grade); MATV scores 39/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, EMR.AX or MATV?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. EMR.AX and MATV are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, EMR.AX or MATV?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are EMR.AX and MATV both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both Emerald Resources NL (EMR.AX) and Mativ Holdings, Inc. (MATV) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this EMR.AX vs MATV comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Emerald Resources NL

EMR.AX$3.84BMaterials Market cap, Sector

Mativ Holdings

MATV$527.47MMaterials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Emerald Resources NL

EMR.AX 61 MATV

Fit scores by strategy

EMR.AX6wins

1winsMATV

Warren Buffett

79B

F39

Benjamin Graham

89A

F31

Philip Fisher

84B

F32

Peter Lynch

76B

C68

Joel Greenblatt

46D

C60

Charlie Munger

78B

F27

Terry Smith

76B

F22

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EMR.AX	MATV
Market cap	Winner: $3.84B	$527.47M
P/E (TTM)	37.2x	5.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 18.7x	30.6x
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EMR.AX leads on

ROIC (TTM)16.99%vs -11.53%+168%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 2.3x+99%
Market cap$3.84Bvs $527.47M+86%
Net margin20.35%vs 3.86%+81%

MATV leads on

More like EMR.AX

EMR.AX vs LUG.ST EMR.AX vs IGIL.BO EMR.AX vs HINDCOPPER.BO EMR.AX vs CMOCTEZ.MX

More like MATV

MATV vs LUG.ST

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

Emerald Resources NL

Mativ Holdings

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like EMR.AX

More like MATV

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis