Stock comparison
Hess Midstream LP
Mach Natural Resources LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
Market cap
$8.13B
Sector
Energy
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
Market cap
$2.36B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Hess Midstream LP HESM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HESM | MNR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 61C | 57C | HESM |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 34F | HESM |
| Philip Fisher | 61C | 49D | HESM |
| Peter Lynch | 46D | 40D | HESM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 34F | 25F | HESM |
| Charlie Munger | 69B | 54C | HESM |
| Terry Smith | 66B | 47D | HESM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HESM | MNR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.13B | $2.36B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.7x | 10.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.8x | 10.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 20.59% | 8.53% |
| Gross margin | 69.45% | 36.88% |
| Net margin | 22.65% | 17.65% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.73% | 31.55% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.21% | -7.05% |
| Debt / Equity | 10.1x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | 7.74% | 14.03% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HESM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.21%vs -7.05%+158%
- Market cap$8.13Bvs $2.36B+71%
- ROIC (TTM)20.59%vs 8.53%+59%
- Gross margin69.45%vs 36.88%+47%
MNR leads on
- Debt / Equity0.6xvs 10.1x+94%
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.55%vs 7.73%+76%
- Dividend yield14.03%vs 7.74%+45%
- P/E (TTM)10.1xvs 13.7x+27%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.