Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Monolithic Power Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems
Market cap
$76.15B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Monolithic Power Systems MPWR
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | MPWR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 69C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 88A | MPWR |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 93A | MPWR |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 92A | MPWR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 59C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 81C | MPWR |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 85A | MPWR |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $76.15B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 112.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 103.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 16.27% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 55.18% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 22.84% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 23.29% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 24.83% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.43% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $76.15B+78%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 112.7x+64%
- EV/EBIT41.8xvs 103.1x+59%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 16.27%+25%
MPWR leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+100%
- Revenue CAGR 5y23.29%vs 5.31%+77%
- EPS CAGR 5y24.83%vs 7.72%+69%
- Gross margin55.18%vs 48.96%+11%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.