Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Marvell Technology
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
MRVL
Marvell Technology
Market cap
$171.9B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | MRVL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 43D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 65D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 72C | MRVL |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 55C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 47D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 47D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 41D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $171.9B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 56.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 117.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 5.97% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 50.1% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 32.58% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 16.41% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 127.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.14% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 5.97%+72%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.14%+70%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 117.1x+65%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $171.9B+50%
MRVL leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y127.8%vs 7.72%+94%
- Revenue CAGR 5y16.41%vs 5.31%+68%
- Net margin32.58%vs 29.31%+10%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.