Stock comparison
Lam Research
N-able
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
LRCX
Lam Research
Market cap
$385.48B
Sector
Technology
NABL
N-able
Market cap
$689.46M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Lam Research LRCX
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | LRCX | NABL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 37D | LRCX |
| Benjamin Graham | 88A | 16F | LRCX |
| Philip Fisher | 76B | 41D | LRCX |
| Peter Lynch | 69B | 28F | LRCX |
| Joel Greenblatt | 84C | 22F | LRCX |
| Charlie Munger | 86A | 34F | LRCX |
| Terry Smith | 88A | 30F | LRCX |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LRCX | NABL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $385.48B | $689.46M |
| P/E (TTM) | 55.4x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 62.9x | 17.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 42.79% | -4.13% |
| Gross margin | 49.98% | 77.64% |
| Net margin | 30.94% | -1.99% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.96% | 10.23% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 11.27% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
LRCX leads on
- ROIC (TTM)42.79%vs -4.13%+110%
- Net margin30.94%vs -1.99%+106%
- Dividend yield0.34%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$385.48Bvs $689.46M+100%
NABL leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 55.4x+186%
- EV/EBIT17.2xvs 62.9x+73%
- Revenue CAGR 5y10.23%vs 5.96%+42%
- Gross margin77.64%vs 49.98%+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.