Stock comparison
Hamilton Lane
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
Market cap
$5.04B
Sector
Financials
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
Market cap
$3.38B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Hamilton Lane HLNE
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HLNE | NEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76C | 54C | HLNE |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 40D | HLNE |
| Philip Fisher | 77C | 55D | HLNE |
| Peter Lynch | 53C | 25F | HLNE |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 78C | NEA |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 58D | HLNE |
| Terry Smith | 76B | 59C | HLNE |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HLNE | NEA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.04B | $3.38B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.1x | 40.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 15.7x | 36.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 14.52% | -5.93% |
| Gross margin | 69.23% | 80.83% |
| Net margin | 30.59% | 34.49% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.19% | -4.17% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 17.91% | -11.49% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 7.43% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HLNE leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y17.91%vs -11.49%+164%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.19%vs -4.17%+121%
- ROIC (TTM)14.52%vs -5.93%+102%
- P/E (TTM)14.1xvs 40.8x+65%
NEA leads on
- Dividend yield7.43%vs 2.44%+67%
- Gross margin80.83%vs 69.23%+14%
- Net margin34.49%vs 30.59%+11%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.