Stock comparison
Applied Materials
NIQ Global Intelligence
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$345.34B
Sector
Technology
NIQ
NIQ Global Intelligence
Market cap
$2.52B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | NIQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 30F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 53D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 41D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 54C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 30F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 33F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 27F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | NIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $345.34B | $2.52B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 23.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 0.4% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 54.12% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -6.33% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 14.64% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 4.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Net margin29.31%vs -6.33%+122%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$345.34Bvs $2.52B+99%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 0.4%+98%
NIQ leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.0x+123%
- Revenue CAGR 5y14.64%vs 5.31%+64%
- EV/EBIT23.8xvs 41.0x+42%
- Gross margin54.12%vs 48.96%+10%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.