Stock comparison
Hamilton Lane
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
Market cap
$5.04B
Sector
Financials
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
Market cap
$2.39B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Hamilton Lane HLNE
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HLNE | NZF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76C | 48D | HLNE |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 29F | HLNE |
| Philip Fisher | 77C | 48D | HLNE |
| Peter Lynch | 53C | 32F | HLNE |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 82C | NZF |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 53D | HLNE |
| Terry Smith | 76B | 57C | HLNE |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HLNE | NZF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.04B | $2.39B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.1x | 24.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 15.7x | 33.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 14.52% | -9.65% |
| Gross margin | 69.23% | 91.72% |
| Net margin | 30.59% | 65.25% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.19% | 7.44% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 17.91% | -36.19% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 7.55% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HLNE leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y17.91%vs -36.19%+149%
- ROIC (TTM)14.52%vs -9.65%+102%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.19%vs 7.44%+63%
- EV/EBIT15.7xvs 33.9x+54%
NZF leads on
- Dividend yield7.55%vs 2.44%+68%
- Net margin65.25%vs 30.59%+53%
- Gross margin91.72%vs 69.23%+25%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.