Stock comparison
Lundin Gold
LUG.ST$137.36BMaterials Market cap, Sector
OceanaGold
OGC.TO$8.2BMaterials Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Lundin Gold
LUG.ST 70 OGC.TO
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
LUG.ST7wins
0winsOGC.TO
86A
D58
100A
C61
100A
B70
84B
C63
91A
D45
96A
D59
100A
C60
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LUG.ST | OGC.TO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $137.36B | $8.2B |
| P/E (TTM) | 161.9x | 12.3x Winner |
| EV/EBIT | 113.6x | 8.0x Winner |
| ROIC (TTM) | Winner: 65.4% | 28.99% |
| Gross margin | Winner: 68.78% | 46.35% |
| Net margin | Winner: 44.43% | 33.21% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 29.78% | 25.08% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | Winner: 119.05% | 69.34% |
| Debt / Equity | - | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | - | - |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
LUG.ST leads on
- Market cap$137.36Bvs $8.2B+94%
- ROIC (TTM)65.4%vs 28.99%+56%
- EPS CAGR 5y119.05%vs 69.34%+42%
- Gross margin68.78%vs 46.35%+33%
OGC.TO leads on
- EV/EBIT8.0xvs 113.6x+93%
- P/E (TTM)12.3xvs 161.9x+92%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.