Which is better, CSW or OMAB?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) currently grades higher than CSW — 69/100 (B grade) vs 68/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CSW wins on Benjamin Graham and Joel Greenblatt; OMAB wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CSW or OMAB?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CSW and OMAB are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CSW better than OMAB for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (68/100 vs 69/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between CSW and OMAB on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CSW currently scores 68/100 (B grade); OMAB scores 69/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CSW or OMAB?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CSW and OMAB are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CSW or OMAB?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CSW and OMAB both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CSW vs OMAB comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

CSW Industrials

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CSW

CSW Industrials

Market cap

$4.38B

Sector

Industrials

OMAB

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Market cap

$5.01B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. OMAB

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CSW	OMAB	Winner
Warren Buffett	68B	69B	OMAB
Benjamin Graham	80A	66B	CSW
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CSW	OMAB
Market cap	$4.38B	$5.01B
P/E (TTM)	35.8x	16.2x
EV/EBIT	29.4x	10.7x
ROIC (TTM)	6.55%	10.34%
Gross margin	42.72%	69.04%
Net margin	12.64%	32.63%
Revenue CAGR 5y	8.82%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CSW leads on

EPS CAGR 5y33.22%vs 16.57%+50%
Debt / Equity0.7xvs 1.1x+31%

OMAB leads on

Dividend yield5.18%vs 0.4%+92%

More like CSW

CSW vs CTAS CSW vs FAST CSW vs RELX CSW vs TT CSW vs HEI CSW vs TDG

More like OMAB

OMAB vs CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.