Stock comparison
Hess Midstream LP
Par Pacific Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
Market cap
$8.13B
Sector
Energy
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
Market cap
$3.08B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Hess Midstream LP HESM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HESM | PARR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 61C | 33F | HESM |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 21F | HESM |
| Philip Fisher | 61C | 22F | HESM |
| Peter Lynch | 46D | 36D | HESM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 34F | 59C | PARR |
| Charlie Munger | 69B | 30F | HESM |
| Terry Smith | 66B | 33F | HESM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HESM | PARR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.13B | $3.08B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.7x | 6.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.8x | 6.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 20.59% | 47.26% |
| Gross margin | 69.45% | 19.5% |
| Net margin | 22.65% | 6.02% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.73% | 12.2% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.21% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 10.1x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 7.74% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HESM leads on
- Dividend yield7.74%vs 0.0%+100%
- Net margin22.65%vs 6.02%+73%
- Gross margin69.45%vs 19.5%+72%
- Market cap$8.13Bvs $3.08B+62%
PARR leads on
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 10.1x+97%
- ROIC (TTM)47.26%vs 20.59%+56%
- P/E (TTM)6.6xvs 13.7x+52%
- EV/EBIT6.2xvs 11.8x+48%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.