Which is better, FICO or PATH?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) currently grades higher than PATH — 85/100 (A grade) vs 48/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — FICO wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; PATH wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FICO or PATH?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FICO and PATH are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FICO better than PATH for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, FICO currently grades higher — 85/100 vs 48/100, a 37-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between FICO and PATH on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FICO currently scores 85/100 (A grade); PATH scores 48/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FICO or PATH?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FICO and PATH are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FICO or PATH?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FICO and PATH both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and UiPath Inc. (PATH) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FICO vs PATH comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Fair Isaac

FICO$28.75BTechnology Market cap, Sector

UiPath

PATH$5.88BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fair Isaac

FICO 70 PATH

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

FICO7wins

0winsPATH

Warren Buffett

85A

D48

Benjamin Graham

88A

D49

Philip Fisher

85A

D46

Peter Lynch

70B

D57

Joel Greenblatt

94A

D51

Charlie Munger

91A

F37

Terry Smith

95A

D47

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FICO	PATH
Market cap	Winner: $28.75B	$5.88B
P/E (TTM)	33.8x	19.5x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 30.9x	77.5x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 53.2%	2.5%
Gross margin	Winner: 84.16%	83.25%
Net margin	Winner: 33.67%	17.53%
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.89%	15.91% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	18.48%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: -	0.0x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FICO leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 0.0x+102%
ROIC (TTM)53.2%vs 2.5%+95%
Market cap$28.75Bvs $5.88B+80%
EV/EBIT30.9xvs 77.5x+60%

PATH leads on

P/E (TTM)19.5xvs 33.8x+42%
Revenue CAGR 5y15.91%vs 10.89%+32%

More like FICO

FICO vs CAMS.BO FICO vs FTNT FICO vs KLAC FICO vs 4071.T

More like PATH

PATH vs CAMS.BO PATH vs FTNT PATH vs KLAC PATH vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FICO Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PATH

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Fair Isaac

FICO$28.75BTechnology Market cap, Sector

UiPath

PATH$5.88BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fair Isaac

FICO 70 PATH

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

FICO7wins

0winsPATH

Warren Buffett

85A

D48

Benjamin Graham

88A

D49

Philip Fisher

85A

D46

Peter Lynch

70B

D57

Joel Greenblatt

94A

D51

Charlie Munger

91A

F37

Terry Smith

95A

D47

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FICO	PATH
Market cap	Winner: $28.75B	$5.88B
P/E (TTM)	33.8x	19.5x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 30.9x	77.5x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 53.2%	2.5%
Gross margin	Winner: 84.16%	83.25%
Net margin	Winner: 33.67%	17.53%
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.89%	15.91% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	18.48%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: -	0.0x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FICO leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 0.0x+102%
ROIC (TTM)53.2%vs 2.5%+95%
Market cap$28.75Bvs $5.88B+80%
EV/EBIT30.9xvs 77.5x+60%

PATH leads on

P/E (TTM)19.5xvs 33.8x+42%
Revenue CAGR 5y15.91%vs 10.89%+32%

More like FICO

FICO vs CAMS.BO FICO vs FTNT FICO vs KLAC FICO vs 4071.T

More like PATH

PATH vs CAMS.BO PATH vs FTNT PATH vs KLAC PATH vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FICO Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PATH

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.