Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Paymentus Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
PAY
Paymentus Holdings
Market cap
$2.94B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | PAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 41D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 68D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 61C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 53C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 50C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 38D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 43D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | PAY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $2.94B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 45.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 39.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 11.15% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 24.74% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 5.79% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 31.88% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 72.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $2.94B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 5.79%+80%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 24.74%+49%
PAY leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+96%
- EPS CAGR 5y72.4%vs 7.72%+89%
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.88%vs 5.31%+83%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.