Stock comparison
Applied Materials
PagerDuty
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
PD
PagerDuty
Market cap
$656.73M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | PD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 54D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 45D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 49D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 74B | PD |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 64D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 47D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 44D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | PD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $656.73M |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 3.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 129.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 0.84% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 84.95% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 35.3% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 15.02% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.6x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $656.73M+100%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 0.84%+96%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.6x+83%
PD leads on
- P/E (TTM)3.5xvs 40.0x+91%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.02%vs 5.31%+65%
- Gross margin84.95%vs 48.96%+42%
- Net margin35.3%vs 29.31%+17%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.