Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Pagaya Technologies
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
PGY
Pagaya Technologies
Market cap
$1.12B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | PGY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 48D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 44D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 55C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 78C | PGY |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 31F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 55D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 54C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | PGY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $1.12B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 12.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 7.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 17.86% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 41.41% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 7.57% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 29.69% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $1.12B+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.8x+85%
- Net margin29.31%vs 7.57%+74%
PGY leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y29.69%vs 5.31%+82%
- EV/EBIT7.6xvs 41.8x+82%
- P/E (TTM)12.2xvs 40.7x+70%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.