Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Playtika
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
PLTK
Playtika
Market cap
$1.3B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | PLTK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 37D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 14F | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 33F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 6F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 2F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 29F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 24F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | PLTK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $1.3B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 2435.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -4.29% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 73.04% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -10.54% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 1.63% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 10.67% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Net margin29.31%vs -10.54%+136%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -4.29%+120%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $1.3B+100%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 2435.3x+98%
PLTK leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.0x+112%
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+105%
- Dividend yield10.67%vs 0.45%+96%
- Gross margin73.04%vs 48.96%+33%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.