Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Palantir Technologies
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
PLTR
Palantir Technologies
Market cap
$307.65B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | PLTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 59C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 73D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 94C | PLTR |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 74C | PLTR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 35D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 72D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 77B | PLTR |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $307.65B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 140.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 216.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 22.28% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 84.07% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 43.67% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 30.53% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 111.63% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- EV/EBIT41.8xvs 216.1x+81%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 140.6x+71%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $307.65B+11%
PLTR leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y111.63%vs 7.72%+93%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+91%
- Revenue CAGR 5y30.53%vs 5.31%+83%
- Gross margin84.07%vs 48.96%+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.