Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Power Integrations
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
POWI
Power Integrations
Market cap
$4.14B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | POWI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 32F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 74B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 20F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 5F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 41D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 22F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 25F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | POWI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $4.14B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 248.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 190.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 3.6% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 53.86% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 3.72% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -10.89% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -38.52% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.14% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -10.89%+149%
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -38.52%+120%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $4.14B+99%
- Net margin29.31%vs 3.72%+87%
POWI leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+100%
- Dividend yield1.14%vs 0.42%+63%
- Gross margin53.86%vs 48.96%+9%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.