Stock comparison
Moody's
ProAssurance
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
MCO
Moody's
Market cap
$78.46B
Sector
Financials
PRA
ProAssurance
Market cap
$1.27B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
Moody's MCO
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | MCO | PRA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 71B | 20F | MCO |
| Benjamin Graham | 83A | 22F | MCO |
| Philip Fisher | 62C | 12F | MCO |
| Peter Lynch | 68B | 9F | MCO |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 36D | MCO |
| Charlie Munger | 79B | 20F | MCO |
| Terry Smith | 75B | 12F | MCO |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MCO | PRA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $78.46B | $1.27B |
| P/E (TTM) | 30.4x | 19.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 23.4x | 23.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.11% | 3.31% |
| Gross margin | 69.69% | 33.66% |
| Net margin | 31.69% | 6.04% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.55% | 0.52% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 3.68% | -21.97% |
| Debt / Equity | 2.4x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
MCO leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y3.68%vs -21.97%+117%
- Dividend yield0.92%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$78.46Bvs $1.27B+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.55%vs 0.52%+91%
PRA leads on
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 2.4x+87%
- P/E (TTM)19.5xvs 30.4x+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.