Which is better, CHT or PSO?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) currently grades higher than PSO — 58/100 (C grade) vs 47/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CHT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; PSO wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CHT or PSO?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CHT and PSO are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CHT better than PSO for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CHT currently grades higher — 58/100 vs 47/100, a 11-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CHT and PSO on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CHT currently scores 58/100 (C grade); PSO scores 47/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CHT or PSO?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CHT and PSO are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CHT or PSO?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CHT and PSO both Communication Services stocks?

Yes — both Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Pearson plc (PSO) operate in the Communication Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CHT vs PSO comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Chunghwa Telecom

Pearson

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CHT

Chunghwa Telecom

Market cap

$33.88B

Sector

Communication Services

PSO

Pearson

Market cap

$9.15B

Sector

Communication Services

Overall winner

Chunghwa Telecom CHT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CHT	PSO	Winner
Warren Buffett	58C	47D	CHT
Benjamin Graham	70B	53C	CHT
Philip Fisher	42D	42D	Tie
Peter Lynch	56C	36D	CHT
Joel Greenblatt	43D	27F	CHT
Charlie Munger	42D	35D	CHT
Terry Smith	42D	40D	CHT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CHT	PSO
Market cap	$33.88B	$9.15B
P/E (TTM)	27.9x	21.0x
EV/EBIT	22.0x	16.5x
ROIC (TTM)	8.58%	6.98%
Gross margin	35.78%	52.0%
Net margin	16.41%	9.37%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.04%	0.51%
EPS CAGR 5y	2.0%	21.43%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.5x
Dividend yield	3.64%	2.28%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CHT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y3.04%vs 0.51%+83%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+81%
Market cap$33.88Bvs $9.15B+73%
Net margin16.41%vs 9.37%+43%

PSO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y21.43%vs 2.0%+91%
Gross margin52.0%vs 35.78%+31%
EV/EBIT16.5xvs 22.0x+25%
P/E (TTM)21.0xvs 27.9x+25%

More like CHT

CHT vs META CHT vs GOOG CHT vs GOOGL CHT vs NFLX CHT vs TME CHT vs TTD

More like PSO

PSO vs META PSO vs GOOGL PSO vs GOOG PSO vs NFLX PSO vs TME PSO vs TTD

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CHT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PSO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Chunghwa Telecom

Pearson

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CHT

Chunghwa Telecom

Market cap

$33.88B

Sector

Communication Services

PSO

Pearson

Market cap

$9.15B

Sector

Communication Services

Overall winner

Chunghwa Telecom CHT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CHT	PSO	Winner
Warren Buffett	58C	47D	CHT
Benjamin Graham	70B	53C	CHT
Philip Fisher	42D	42D	Tie
Peter Lynch	56C	36D	CHT
Joel Greenblatt	43D	27F	CHT
Charlie Munger	42D	35D	CHT
Terry Smith	42D	40D	CHT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CHT	PSO
Market cap	$33.88B	$9.15B
P/E (TTM)	27.9x	21.0x
EV/EBIT	22.0x	16.5x
ROIC (TTM)	8.58%	6.98%
Gross margin	35.78%	52.0%
Net margin	16.41%	9.37%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.04%	0.51%
EPS CAGR 5y	2.0%	21.43%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.5x
Dividend yield	3.64%	2.28%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CHT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y3.04%vs 0.51%+83%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+81%
Market cap$33.88Bvs $9.15B+73%
Net margin16.41%vs 9.37%+43%

PSO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y21.43%vs 2.0%+91%
Gross margin52.0%vs 35.78%+31%
EV/EBIT16.5xvs 22.0x+25%
P/E (TTM)21.0xvs 27.9x+25%

More like CHT

CHT vs META CHT vs GOOG CHT vs GOOGL CHT vs NFLX CHT vs TME CHT vs TTD

More like PSO

PSO vs META PSO vs GOOGL PSO vs GOOG PSO vs NFLX PSO vs TME PSO vs TTD

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CHT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for PSO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.