Phillips 66 vs Exxon Mobil stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Phillips 66 grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Exxon Mobil is more profitable and has less debt.
Side by side
| Phillips 66 | Exxon Mobil | |
|---|---|---|
| $103 billion | $696 billion | |
| 3.3% | 8.9% | |
| +15.6% | −6.7% | |
| 23.5× | 24.1× | |
| 1.9 years | 0.5 years | |
| 10.8% | 13.1% | |
| 2.8% | 2.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Phillips 66 vs Canadian Natural Resources · Phillips 66 vs Chevron · Phillips 66 vs Enbridge · Phillips 66 vs EOG Resources · Exxon Mobil vs Reliance Industries · Exxon Mobil vs Shell · Exxon Mobil vs SLB · Exxon Mobil vs Targa Resources