Stock comparison
Applied Materials
D-Wave Quantum
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
Market cap
$7.47B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | QBTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 68B | 20F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 79B | 40D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 40D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 57C | 43D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 0F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 67B | 32F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 63C | 32F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $7.47B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -11.38% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 66.27% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -29.57% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 40.67% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -11.38%+153%
- Net margin29.31%vs -29.57%+101%
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $7.47B+98%
QBTS leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.8x+159%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.7x+150%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+96%
- Revenue CAGR 5y40.67%vs 5.31%+87%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.