Which is better, QLD or SLDE?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (SLDE) currently grades higher than QLD — 81/100 (C grade) vs 50/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — QLD wins on none; SLDE wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy QLD or SLDE?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both QLD and SLDE are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is QLD better than SLDE for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, SLDE currently grades higher — 81/100 vs 50/100, a 31-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between QLD and SLDE on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). QLD currently scores 50/100 (C grade); SLDE scores 81/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, QLD or SLDE?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. QLD and SLDE are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, QLD or SLDE?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are QLD and SLDE both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (SLDE) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this QLD vs SLDE comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

ProShares - Ultra QQQ

Slide Insurance Holdings

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

QLD

Market cap

$12.01B

Sector

Financials

SLDE

Slide Insurance Holdings

Market cap

$2.13B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Slide Insurance Holdings SLDE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	QLD	SLDE	Winner
Warren Buffett	50C	81C	SLDE
Benjamin Graham	50C	50C	Tie

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	QLD	SLDE
Market cap	$12.01B	$2.13B
P/E (TTM)	-	4.7x
EV/EBIT	-	1.7x
ROIC (TTM)	-	41.91%
Gross margin	-	81.47%
Net margin	-	38.86%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-	68.31%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

QLD leads on

Market cap$12.01Bvs $2.13B+82%

SLDE leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

More like QLD

QLD vs MA QLD vs HLNE QLD vs KNSL QLD vs SPGI QLD vs EVR QLD vs MCO

More like SLDE

SLDE vs MA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.