Which is better, QQQM or WT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) currently grades higher than QQQM — 71/100 (B grade) vs 50/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — QQQM wins on Joel Greenblatt; WT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy QQQM or WT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both QQQM and WT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is QQQM better than WT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, WT currently grades higher — 71/100 vs 50/100, a 21-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between QQQM and WT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). QQQM currently scores 50/100 (C grade); WT scores 71/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, QQQM or WT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. QQQM and WT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, QQQM or WT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are QQQM and WT both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and WisdomTree, Inc. (WT) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this QQQM vs WT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

WisdomTree

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

QQQM

Market cap

$82.92B

Sector

Financials

WisdomTree

Market cap

$2.92B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

WisdomTree WT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	QQQM	WT	Winner
Warren Buffett	50C	71B	WT
Benjamin Graham	50C	98A	WT
Philip Fisher	50C	81C	WT
Peter Lynch	50C	69B	WT
Joel Greenblatt	50C	34F	QQQM
Charlie Munger	50C	70D	WT
Terry Smith	50C	71D	WT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	QQQM	WT
Market cap	$82.92B	$2.92B
P/E (TTM)	-	43.6x
EV/EBIT	-	20.4x
ROIC (TTM)	-	7.12%
Gross margin	-	70.28%
Net margin	-	11.26%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-	12.86%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	25.95%
Debt / Equity	-	2.5x
Dividend yield	-	0.62%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

QQQM leads on

Market cap$82.92Bvs $2.92B+96%

WT leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

More like QQQM

QQQM vs ING.WA QQQM vs PKO.WA QQQM vs MSCI QQQM vs PEO.WA QQQM vs SPL.WA QQQM vs ICICIBANK.NS

More like WT

WT vs ING.WA WT vs PKO.WA WT vs MSCI WT vs PEO.WA WT vs SPL.WA WT vs ICICIBANK.NS

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for QQQM Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

WisdomTree

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Market cap

$82.92B

Sector

Financials

WisdomTree

Market cap

$2.92B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

WisdomTree WT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	QQQM	WT	Winner
Warren Buffett	50C	71B	WT
Benjamin Graham	50C	98A	WT
Philip Fisher	50C	81C	WT
Peter Lynch	50C	69B	WT
Joel Greenblatt	50C	34F	QQQM
Charlie Munger	50C	70D	WT
Terry Smith	50C	71D	WT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	QQQM	WT
Market cap	$82.92B	$2.92B
P/E (TTM)	-	43.6x
EV/EBIT	-	20.4x
ROIC (TTM)	-	7.12%
Gross margin	-	70.28%
Net margin	-	11.26%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-	12.86%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	25.95%
Debt / Equity	-	2.5x
Dividend yield	-	0.62%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

QQQM leads on

Market cap$82.92Bvs $2.92B+96%

WT leads on

No clear edges - the other side wins or ties on every measured metric.

More like QQQM

QQQM vs ING.WA QQQM vs PKO.WA QQQM vs MSCI QQQM vs PEO.WA QQQM vs SPL.WA QQQM vs ICICIBANK.NS

More like WT

WT vs ING.WA WT vs PKO.WA WT vs MSCI WT vs PEO.WA WT vs SPL.WA WT vs ICICIBANK.NS

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for QQQM Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.