Stock comparison
Restaurant Brands International
QSR$26.15BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Winmark
WINA$1.31BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Winmark
QSR 15 WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
QSR1wins
5winsWINA
60C
B80
79B
B77
48D
C66
41F
C64
33F
C69
57D
D57
54D
D58
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | QSR | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $26.15B | $1.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | Winner: 27.6x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | Winner: 18.3x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.03% | 2.43% Winner |
| Gross margin | 44.8% | 96.66% Winner |
| Net margin | 9.96% | 48.19% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 13.23% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -3.4% | 1.92% Winner |
| Debt / Equity | 4.2x | - Winner |
| Dividend yield | 3.31% | 3.84% Winner |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
QSR leads on
- Market cap$26.15Bvs $1.31B+95%
- Revenue CAGR 5y13.23%vs 2.42%+82%
- EV/EBIT18.3xvs 24.5x+25%
- P/E (TTM)27.6xvs 31.6x+13%
WINA leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y1.92%vs -3.4%+157%
- Debt / Equity-vs 4.2x+132%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 8.03%+97%
- Net margin48.19%vs 9.96%+79%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.