Stock comparison
RB Global
Symbotic
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
RBA
RB Global
Market cap
$19.05B
Sector
Industrials
SYM
Symbotic
Market cap
$31.91B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
RB Global RBA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | RBA | SYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 54C | 14F | RBA |
| Benjamin Graham | 73B | 31F | RBA |
| Philip Fisher | 60C | 27F | RBA |
| Peter Lynch | 69B | 48D | RBA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 40D | 40D | Tie |
| Charlie Munger | 51C | 12F | RBA |
| Terry Smith | 48D | 12F | RBA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | RBA | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $19.05B | $31.91B |
| P/E (TTM) | 42.1x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 27.2x | 35.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 6.35% | -1.52% |
| Gross margin | 45.26% | 19.54% |
| Net margin | 9.54% | -0.2% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 34.74% | 72.82% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 10.93% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.7x | - |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
RBA leads on
- ROIC (TTM)6.35%vs -1.52%+124%
- Net margin9.54%vs -0.2%+102%
- Dividend yield1.19%vs 0.0%+100%
- Gross margin45.26%vs 19.54%+57%
SYM leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 42.1x+103%
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.7x+100%
- Revenue CAGR 5y72.82%vs 34.74%+52%
- Market cap$31.91Bvs $19.05B+40%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.