Which is better, RMS.PA or WINA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) currently grades higher than WINA — 79/100 (B grade) vs 80/100 (A). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — RMS.PA wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; WINA wins on Warren Buffett and Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy RMS.PA or WINA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both RMS.PA and WINA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is RMS.PA better than WINA for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (79/100 vs 80/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between RMS.PA and WINA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). RMS.PA currently scores 79/100 (B grade); WINA scores 80/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, RMS.PA or WINA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. RMS.PA and WINA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, RMS.PA or WINA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are RMS.PA and WINA both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and Winmark Corporation (WINA) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this RMS.PA vs WINA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

RMS.PA$176.07BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Winmark

WINA$1.29BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

RMS.PA 52 WINA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RMS.PA5wins

2winsWINA

Warren Buffett

79B

B80

Benjamin Graham

90A

B77

Philip Fisher

84B

C66

Peter Lynch

69C

C64

Joel Greenblatt

61C

C69

Charlie Munger

86A

D57

Terry Smith

85A

D58

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RMS.PA	WINA
Market cap	Winner: $176.07B	$1.29B
P/E (TTM)	38.1x	31.6x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 23.8x	24.5x
ROIC (TTM)	24.18%	2.43% Winner
Gross margin	71.11%	96.66% Winner
Net margin	28.27%	48.19% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 11.31%	2.42%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 16.93%	1.92%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	- Winner
Dividend yield	-	3.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RMS.PA leads on

Market cap$176.07Bvs $1.29B+99%
EPS CAGR 5y16.93%vs 1.92%+89%
Revenue CAGR 5y11.31%vs 2.42%+79%

WINA leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 0.1x+109%
ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 24.18%+90%
Net margin48.19%vs 28.27%+41%
Gross margin96.66%vs 71.11%+26%

More like RMS.PA

RMS.PA vs GRGD.TO RMS.PA vs GAW.L RMS.PA vs 2059.TW RMS.PA vs 4165.SR

More like WINA

WINA vs GRGD.TO WINA vs GAW.L WINA vs 2059.TW WINA vs 4165.SR

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RMS.PA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WINA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RMS.PA	WINA
Market cap	Winner: $176.07B	$1.29B
P/E (TTM)	38.1x	31.6x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 23.8x	24.5x
ROIC (TTM)	24.18%	2.43% Winner
Gross margin	71.11%	96.66% Winner
Net margin	28.27%	48.19% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 11.31%	2.42%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 16.93%	1.92%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	- Winner
Dividend yield	-	3.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RMS.PA leads on

Market cap$176.07Bvs $1.29B+99%
EPS CAGR 5y16.93%vs 1.92%+89%
Revenue CAGR 5y11.31%vs 2.42%+79%

WINA leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 0.1x+109%
ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 24.18%+90%
Net margin48.19%vs 28.27%+41%
Gross margin96.66%vs 71.11%+26%