Which is better, RATI.TA or RRC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership (RATI.TA) currently grades higher than RRC — 72/100 (B grade) vs 48/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — RATI.TA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; RRC wins on Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy RATI.TA or RRC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both RATI.TA and RRC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is RATI.TA better than RRC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, RATI.TA currently grades higher — 72/100 vs 48/100, a 24-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between RATI.TA and RRC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). RATI.TA currently scores 72/100 (B grade); RRC scores 48/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, RATI.TA or RRC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. RATI.TA and RRC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, RATI.TA or RRC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are RATI.TA and RRC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership (RATI.TA) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this RATI.TA vs RRC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA$4.67BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Range Resources

RRC$8.95BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA 61 RRC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RATI.TA6wins

1winsRRC

Warren Buffett

72B

D48

Benjamin Graham

91A

F43

Philip Fisher

64C

D49

Peter Lynch

31F

F33

Joel Greenblatt

59D

F35

Charlie Munger

83B

D48

Terry Smith

77B

F43

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RATI.TA	RRC
Market cap	$4.67B	$8.95B Winner
P/E (TTM)	40.2x	11.1x Winner
EV/EBIT	28.2x	13.1x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 14.65%	11.18%
Gross margin	Winner: 59.24%	42.24%
Net margin	Winner: 37.39%	28.41%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: -4.11%	-4.38%
EPS CAGR 5y	-5.73%	13.73% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.0x	0.2x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.87%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RATI.TA leads on

Gross margin59.24%vs 42.24%+29%
Net margin37.39%vs 28.41%+24%
ROIC (TTM)14.65%vs 11.18%+24%
Revenue CAGR 5y-4.11%vs -4.38%+6%

RRC leads on

EPS CAGR 5y13.73%vs -5.73%+142%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 1.0x+80%
P/E (TTM)11.1xvs 40.2x+73%
EV/EBIT13.1xvs 28.2x+53%

More like RATI.TA

RATI.TA vs BSM RATI.TA vs DMLP RATI.TA vs VAR.OL RATI.TA vs GTT.PA

More like RRC

RRC vs BSM RRC vs DMLP RRC vs VAR.OL RRC vs GTT.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RATI.TA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RRC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA$4.67BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Range Resources

RRC$8.95BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Ratio Energies - Limited Partnership

RATI.TA 61 RRC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RATI.TA6wins

1winsRRC

Warren Buffett

72B

D48

Benjamin Graham

91A

F43

Philip Fisher

64C

D49

Peter Lynch

31F

F33

Joel Greenblatt

59D

F35

Charlie Munger

83B

D48

Terry Smith

77B

F43

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RATI.TA	RRC
Market cap	$4.67B	$8.95B Winner
P/E (TTM)	40.2x	11.1x Winner
EV/EBIT	28.2x	13.1x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 14.65%	11.18%
Gross margin	Winner: 59.24%	42.24%
Net margin	Winner: 37.39%	28.41%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: -4.11%	-4.38%
EPS CAGR 5y	-5.73%	13.73% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.0x	0.2x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.87%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RATI.TA leads on

Gross margin59.24%vs 42.24%+29%
Net margin37.39%vs 28.41%+24%
ROIC (TTM)14.65%vs 11.18%+24%
Revenue CAGR 5y-4.11%vs -4.38%+6%

RRC leads on

EPS CAGR 5y13.73%vs -5.73%+142%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 1.0x+80%
P/E (TTM)11.1xvs 40.2x+73%
EV/EBIT13.1xvs 28.2x+53%

More like RATI.TA

RATI.TA vs BSM RATI.TA vs DMLP RATI.TA vs VAR.OL RATI.TA vs GTT.PA

More like RRC

RRC vs BSM RRC vs DMLP RRC vs VAR.OL RRC vs GTT.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RATI.TA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RRC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.