Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Rumble
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
RUMBW
Rumble
Market cap
$680.26M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | RUMBW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 41D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 55D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 56C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 45D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 2F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 54D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 58C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | RUMBW |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $680.26M |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | -27.21% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 14.71% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -106.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 80.56% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs -27.21%+179%
- Net margin29.31%vs -106.91%+127%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $680.26M+100%
RUMBW leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.0x+192%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.0x+143%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y80.56%vs 5.31%+93%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.