Stock comparison
A10 Networks
Sanmina
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ATEN
A10 Networks
Market cap
$1.97B
Sector
Technology
SANM
Sanmina
Market cap
$12.61B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
A10 Networks ATEN
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ATEN | SANM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 69B | 45D | ATEN |
| Benjamin Graham | 86A | 78B | ATEN |
| Philip Fisher | 52C | 31F | ATEN |
| Peter Lynch | 21F | 46D | SANM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 46D | 45D | ATEN |
| Charlie Munger | 68B | 32F | ATEN |
| Terry Smith | 64C | 35D | ATEN |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ATEN | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.97B | $12.61B |
| P/E (TTM) | 43.9x | 49.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 45.2x | 37.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.15% | 7.43% |
| Gross margin | 79.5% | 8.53% |
| Net margin | 14.9% | 2.29% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.83% | 4.8% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.13% | 2.57% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.9x |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ATEN leads on
- Dividend yield0.88%vs 0.0%+100%
- Gross margin79.5%vs 8.53%+89%
- Net margin14.9%vs 2.29%+85%
- P/E (TTM)43.9xvs 49.2x+11%
SANM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y2.57%vs -17.13%+115%
- Market cap$12.61Bvs $1.97B+84%
- Revenue CAGR 5y4.8%vs 3.83%+20%
- EV/EBIT37.3xvs 45.2x+18%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.