Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Silicon Motion Technology
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
Market cap
$9.27B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | SIMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 37D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 59C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 45D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 41D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 64C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 39D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 32F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $9.27B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 11.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 85.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 12.08% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 48.09% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 16.02% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -1.0% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 26.23% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.83% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -1.0%+119%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $9.27B+97%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 85.0x+52%
- Net margin29.31%vs 16.02%+45%
SIMO leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+100%
- EPS CAGR 5y26.23%vs 7.72%+71%
- P/E (TTM)11.9xvs 40.0x+70%
- Dividend yield0.83%vs 0.45%+47%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.