Which is better, SKT or XHR?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Tanger Inc. (SKT) currently grades higher than XHR — 61/100 (D grade) vs 41/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — SKT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger; XHR wins on Joel Greenblatt and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy SKT or XHR?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both SKT and XHR are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is SKT better than XHR for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, SKT currently grades higher — 61/100 vs 41/100, a 20-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between SKT and XHR on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). SKT currently scores 61/100 (D grade); XHR scores 41/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, SKT or XHR?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. SKT and XHR are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, SKT or XHR?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are SKT and XHR both Real Estate stocks?

Yes — both Tanger Inc. (SKT) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) operate in the Real Estate sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this SKT vs XHR comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Tanger

Xenia Hotels & Resorts

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

SKT

Tanger

Market cap

$4.08B

Sector

Real Estate

XHR

Xenia Hotels & Resorts

Market cap

$1.55B

Sector

Real Estate

Overall winner

Tanger SKT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	SKT	XHR	Winner
Warren Buffett	61D	41D	SKT
Benjamin Graham	77B	45D	SKT
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SKT	XHR
Market cap	$4.08B	$1.55B
P/E (TTM)	32.9x	22.7x
EV/EBIT	33.4x	26.2x
ROIC (TTM)	4.2%	70.56%
Gross margin	42.62%	-3.65%
Net margin	20.76%	6.2%
Revenue CAGR 5y	8.06%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SKT leads on

Gross margin42.62%vs -3.65%+109%
Net margin20.76%vs 6.2%+70%
Market cap$4.08Bvs $1.55B+62%

XHR leads on

More like SKT

SKT vs AMH SKT vs GLPI SKT vs DOC SKT vs AAT SKT vs MRP SKT vs LTC

More like XHR

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.