Which is better, SPGI or WTM?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) currently grades higher than WTM — 74/100 (C grade) vs 38/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — SPGI wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; WTM wins on Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy SPGI or WTM?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both SPGI and WTM are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is SPGI better than WTM for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, SPGI currently grades higher — 74/100 vs 38/100, a 36-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between SPGI and WTM on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). SPGI currently scores 74/100 (C grade); WTM scores 38/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, SPGI or WTM?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. SPGI and WTM are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, SPGI or WTM?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are SPGI and WTM both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this SPGI vs WTM comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

S&P Global

White Mountains Insurance Group

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

SPGI

S&P Global

Market cap

$123.61B

Sector

Financials

WTM

White Mountains Insurance Group

Market cap

$5.32B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

S&P Global SPGI

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	SPGI	WTM	Winner
Warren Buffett	74C	38D	SPGI
Benjamin Graham	66B	19F	SPGI
Philip Fisher	70C	54C	SPGI
Peter Lynch	68C	81A	WTM
Joel Greenblatt	42D	41D	SPGI
Charlie Munger	70B	36D	SPGI
Terry Smith	70B	36D	SPGI

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SPGI	WTM
Market cap	$123.61B	$5.32B
P/E (TTM)	25.1x	5.2x
EV/EBIT	20.3x	4.5x
ROIC (TTM)	9.89%	2.85%
Gross margin	70.47%	58.96%
Net margin	30.37%	39.37%
Revenue CAGR 5y	16.6%	44.88%
EPS CAGR 5y	3.96%	-
Debt / Equity	0.4x	0.2x
Dividend yield	0.95%	0.05%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SPGI leads on

Market cap$123.61Bvs $5.32B+96%
Dividend yield0.95%vs 0.05%+95%
Gross margin70.47%vs 58.96%+16%

WTM leads on

ROIC (TTM)2.85%vs 9.89%+97%
P/E (TTM)5.2xvs 25.1x+79%
EV/EBIT4.5xvs 20.3x+78%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.4x+65%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

S&P Global

White Mountains Insurance Group

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like SPGI

More like WTM

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis