Stock comparison
CF Industries Holdings
SSR Mining
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CF
CF Industries Holdings
Market cap
$18.7B
Sector
Materials
SSRM
SSR Mining
Market cap
$6.17B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
CF Industries Holdings CF
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CF | SSRM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 64C | 44D | CF |
| Benjamin Graham | 72B | 49D | CF |
| Philip Fisher | 60C | 40D | CF |
| Peter Lynch | 42D | 51C | SSRM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 35D | 26F | CF |
| Charlie Munger | 66C | 37D | CF |
| Terry Smith | 69B | 32F | CF |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CF | SSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.7B | $6.17B |
| P/E (TTM) | 10.9x | 28.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 8.8x | 12.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 15.41% | 11.09% |
| Gross margin | 40.41% | 55.85% |
| Net margin | 23.73% | 12.17% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.03% | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 20.46% | 3.49% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.7x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CF leads on
- Dividend yield1.61%vs 0.0%+100%
- EPS CAGR 5y20.46%vs 3.49%+83%
- Market cap$18.7Bvs $6.17B+67%
- P/E (TTM)10.9xvs 28.0x+61%
SSRM leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.7x+97%
- Revenue CAGR 5y2.98%vs 2.03%+32%
- Gross margin55.85%vs 40.41%+28%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.