Stock comparison
Applied Materials
TaskUs
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
TASK
TaskUs
Market cap
$555.72M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | TASK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 43D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 45D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 28F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 57C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 31F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 31F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 27F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | TASK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $555.72M |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 5.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 6.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 12.15% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 35.48% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 8.7% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 11.68% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 2.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 62.29% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $555.72M+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 2.0x+86%
- Net margin29.31%vs 8.7%+70%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 12.15%+44%
TASK leads on
- Dividend yield62.29%vs 0.45%+99%
- P/E (TTM)5.0xvs 40.0x+87%
- EV/EBIT6.5xvs 41.0x+84%
- Revenue CAGR 5y11.68%vs 5.31%+55%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.