Which is better, SANOFICONR.NS or TBPH?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, SANOFI CONS HEALTHC IND L (SANOFICONR.NS) currently grades higher than TBPH — 78/100 (B grade) vs 53/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — SANOFICONR.NS wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; TBPH wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy SANOFICONR.NS or TBPH?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both SANOFICONR.NS and TBPH are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is SANOFICONR.NS better than TBPH for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, SANOFICONR.NS currently grades higher — 78/100 vs 53/100, a 25-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between SANOFICONR.NS and TBPH on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). SANOFICONR.NS currently scores 78/100 (B grade); TBPH scores 53/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, SANOFICONR.NS or TBPH?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. SANOFICONR.NS and TBPH are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, SANOFICONR.NS or TBPH?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are SANOFICONR.NS and TBPH both Healthcare stocks?

Yes — both SANOFI CONS HEALTHC IND L (SANOFICONR.NS) and Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (TBPH) operate in the Healthcare sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this SANOFICONR.NS vs TBPH comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

SANOFI CONS HEALTHC IND L

SANOFICONR.NS$104.11BHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Theravance Biopharma

TBPH$877.45MHealthcare Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

SANOFI CONS HEALTHC IND L

SANOFICONR.NS 70 TBPH

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

SANOFICONR.NS7wins

0winsTBPH

Warren Buffett

78B

D53

Benjamin Graham

89A

D51

Philip Fisher

83B

D45

Peter Lynch

77B

D53

Joel Greenblatt

91A

F36

Charlie Munger

86A

F39

Terry Smith

85A

D56

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SANOFICONR.NS	TBPH
Market cap	Winner: $104.11B	$877.45M
P/E (TTM)	44.2x	7.4x Winner
EV/EBIT	31.8x	- Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 59.15%	-1.32%
Gross margin	68.13%	104.1% Winner
Net margin	27.35%	104.34% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 27.01%	18.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	20.67%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	0.3x
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SANOFICONR.NS leads on

ROIC (TTM)59.15%vs -1.32%+102%
Market cap$104.11Bvs $877.45M+99%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+74%
Revenue CAGR 5y27.01%vs 18.06%+33%

TBPH leads on

EV/EBIT-vs 31.8x+167%
P/E (TTM)7.4xvs 44.2x+83%
Net margin104.34%vs 27.35%+74%
Gross margin104.1%vs 68.13%+35%

More like SANOFICONR.NS

SANOFICONR.NS vs 1681.HK SANOFICONR.NS vs PME.AX SANOFICONR.NS vs SANOFICONR.BO SANOFICONR.NS vs CAMX.ST

More like TBPH

TBPH vs 1681.HK TBPH vs PME.AX TBPH vs SANOFICONR.BO TBPH vs CAMX.ST

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SANOFICONR.NS Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TBPH

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SANOFICONR.NS	TBPH
Market cap	Winner: $104.11B	$877.45M
P/E (TTM)	44.2x	7.4x Winner
EV/EBIT	31.8x	- Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 59.15%	-1.32%
Gross margin	68.13%	104.1% Winner
Net margin	27.35%	104.34% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 27.01%	18.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	20.67%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	0.3x
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SANOFICONR.NS leads on

ROIC (TTM)59.15%vs -1.32%+102%
Market cap$104.11Bvs $877.45M+99%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+74%
Revenue CAGR 5y27.01%vs 18.06%+33%

TBPH leads on

EV/EBIT-vs 31.8x+167%
P/E (TTM)7.4xvs 44.2x+83%
Net margin104.34%vs 27.35%+74%
Gross margin104.1%vs 68.13%+35%