Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Teradyne
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
TER
Teradyne
Market cap
$52.89B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | TER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 65B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 84A | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 60D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 24F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 69C | TER |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 78B | TER |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 70C | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $52.89B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 61.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 76.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 25.66% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 58.79% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 22.55% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -3.66% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -13.21% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.15% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -3.66%+169%
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -13.21%+158%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $52.89B+85%
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.15%+66%
TER leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+90%
- Gross margin58.79%vs 48.96%+17%
- ROIC (TTM)25.66%vs 21.6%+16%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.