Stock comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Teekay
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Market cap
$2.94B
Sector
Energy
TK
Teekay
Market cap
$1.16B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BSM | TK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 57C | BSM |
| Benjamin Graham | 64C | 52C | BSM |
| Philip Fisher | 68D | 48D | BSM |
| Peter Lynch | 37D | 46D | TK |
| Joel Greenblatt | 55C | 23F | BSM |
| Charlie Munger | 83A | 37D | BSM |
| Terry Smith | 84C | 44D | BSM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BSM | TK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.94B | $1.16B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.6x | 12.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.6x | 1.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.66% | 13.48% |
| Gross margin | 78.01% | 15.92% |
| Net margin | 63.48% | 10.33% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -4.41% | 8.6% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 13.55% | 94.29% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 8.97% | 14.68% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BSM leads on
- Net margin63.48%vs 10.33%+84%
- Gross margin78.01%vs 15.92%+80%
- Market cap$2.94Bvs $1.16B+61%
- ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 13.48%+51%
TK leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y8.6%vs -4.41%+151%
- EV/EBIT1.4xvs 11.6x+88%
- EPS CAGR 5y94.29%vs 13.55%+86%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.2x+63%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.