Stock comparison
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
RMS.PA$170.15BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Tapestry
TPR$28.27BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions
RMS.PA 61 TPR
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
RMS.PA6wins
1winsTPR
79B
D54
90A
A91
84B
F39
69C
F30
61C
D53
86A
D53
85A
D48
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | RMS.PA | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $170.15B | $28.27B |
| P/E (TTM) | Winner: 38.1x | 39.5x |
| EV/EBIT | Winner: 23.8x | 69.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | Winner: 24.18% | 13.26% |
| Gross margin | 71.11% | 76.18% Winner |
| Net margin | Winner: 28.27% | 8.44% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 11.31% | 5.1% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | Winner: 16.93% | -27.04% |
| Debt / Equity | Winner: 0.1x | 5.7x |
| Dividend yield | - | 1.2% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
RMS.PA leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y16.93%vs -27.04%+163%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 5.7x+98%
- Market cap$170.15Bvs $28.27B+83%
- Net margin28.27%vs 8.44%+70%
TPR leads on
- Gross margin76.18%vs 71.11%+7%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.