Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Trimble
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
TRMB
Trimble
Market cap
$13.13B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | TRMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 35D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 57C | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 33F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 14F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 38D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 33F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 23F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | TRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $13.13B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 28.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 23.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 7.09% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 68.06% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 12.37% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | -0.49% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -2.52% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -2.52%+133%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs -0.49%+109%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $13.13B+96%
TRMB leads on
- EV/EBIT23.1xvs 41.0x+44%
- P/E (TTM)28.3xvs 40.0x+29%
- Gross margin68.06%vs 48.96%+28%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.3x+7%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.