Stock comparison
Haemonetics
Taysha Gene Therapies
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HAE
Haemonetics
Market cap
$2.98B
Sector
Healthcare
TSHA
Taysha Gene Therapies
Market cap
$1.37B
Sector
Healthcare
Overall winner
Haemonetics HAE
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HAE | TSHA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 70B | 41D | HAE |
| Benjamin Graham | 85A | 56D | HAE |
| Philip Fisher | 60C | 61C | TSHA |
| Peter Lynch | 54C | 5F | HAE |
| Joel Greenblatt | 31F | 2F | HAE |
| Charlie Munger | 54D | 57D | TSHA |
| Terry Smith | 55D | 58D | TSHA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HAE | TSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.98B | $1.37B |
| P/E (TTM) | 24.8x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 14.1x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.37% | -47.3% |
| Gross margin | 55.74% | 88.22% |
| Net margin | 7.29% | -17.38% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.65% | - |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 24.62% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 1.5x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HAE leads on
- ROIC (TTM)8.37%vs -47.3%+118%
- Net margin7.29%vs -17.38%+100%
- Market cap$2.98Bvs $1.37B+54%
TSHA leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 14.1x+171%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 24.8x+162%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.5x+95%
- Gross margin88.22%vs 55.74%+37%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.