Which is better, TNE.AX or TYL?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Technology One Limited (TNE.AX) currently grades higher than TYL — 82/100 (A grade) vs 59/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — TNE.AX wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; TYL wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy TNE.AX or TYL?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both TNE.AX and TYL are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is TNE.AX better than TYL for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, TNE.AX currently grades higher — 82/100 vs 59/100, a 23-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between TNE.AX and TYL on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). TNE.AX currently scores 82/100 (A grade); TYL scores 59/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, TNE.AX or TYL?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. TNE.AX and TYL are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, TNE.AX or TYL?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are TNE.AX and TYL both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Technology One Limited (TNE.AX) and Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this TNE.AX vs TYL comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Technology One Limited

TNE.AX$9.81BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Tyler Technologies

TYL$11.47BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Technology One Limited

TNE.AX 70 TYL

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

TNE.AX7wins

0winsTYL

Warren Buffett

82B

D59

Benjamin Graham

80B

C69

Philip Fisher

88A

D56

Peter Lynch

81B

D58

Joel Greenblatt

70B

D46

Charlie Munger

87A

F38

Terry Smith

90A

F40

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	TNE.AX	TYL
Market cap	$9.81B	$11.47B Winner
P/E (TTM)	74.5x	41.6x Winner
EV/EBIT	55.2x	35.5x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 25.7%	7.68%
Gross margin	Winner: 86.31%	45.57%
Net margin	Winner: 23.0%	13.26%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 17.57%	10.01%
EPS CAGR 5y	15.08%	16.68% Winner
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

TNE.AX leads on

ROIC (TTM)25.7%vs 7.68%+70%
Gross margin86.31%vs 45.57%+47%
Revenue CAGR 5y17.57%vs 10.01%+43%
Net margin23.0%vs 13.26%+42%

TYL leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.1x+89%
P/E (TTM)41.6xvs 74.5x+44%
EV/EBIT35.5xvs 55.2x+36%
Market cap$11.47Bvs $9.81B+14%

More like TNE.AX

TNE.AX vs FICO TNE.AX vs CAMS.BO TNE.AX vs FTNT TNE.AX vs KLAC

More like TYL

TYL vs FICO TYL vs CAMS.BO TYL vs FTNT TYL vs KLAC

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TNE.AX Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TYL

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Technology One Limited

TNE.AX$9.81BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Tyler Technologies

TYL$11.47BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Technology One Limited

TNE.AX 70 TYL

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

TNE.AX7wins

0winsTYL

Warren Buffett

82B

D59

Benjamin Graham

80B

C69

Philip Fisher

88A

D56

Peter Lynch

81B

D58

Joel Greenblatt

70B

D46

Charlie Munger

87A

F38

Terry Smith

90A

F40

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	TNE.AX	TYL
Market cap	$9.81B	$11.47B Winner
P/E (TTM)	74.5x	41.6x Winner
EV/EBIT	55.2x	35.5x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 25.7%	7.68%
Gross margin	Winner: 86.31%	45.57%
Net margin	Winner: 23.0%	13.26%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 17.57%	10.01%
EPS CAGR 5y	15.08%	16.68% Winner
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

TNE.AX leads on

ROIC (TTM)25.7%vs 7.68%+70%
Gross margin86.31%vs 45.57%+47%
Revenue CAGR 5y17.57%vs 10.01%+43%
Net margin23.0%vs 13.26%+42%

TYL leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.1x+89%
P/E (TTM)41.6xvs 74.5x+44%
EV/EBIT35.5xvs 55.2x+36%
Market cap$11.47Bvs $9.81B+14%

More like TNE.AX

TNE.AX vs FICO TNE.AX vs CAMS.BO TNE.AX vs FTNT TNE.AX vs KLAC

More like TYL

TYL vs FICO TYL vs CAMS.BO TYL vs FTNT TYL vs KLAC

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TNE.AX Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TYL

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.