Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Uber
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
UBER
Uber
Market cap
$152.85B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | UBER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 51C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 46D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 60C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 60C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 57C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 43D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 40D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $152.85B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 18.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 29.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 12.14% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 41.03% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 15.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 31.39% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 100.67% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.6x+58%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $152.85B+56%
- Net margin29.31%vs 15.91%+46%
UBER leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y100.67%vs 7.72%+92%
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.39%vs 5.31%+83%
- P/E (TTM)18.0xvs 40.7x+56%
- EV/EBIT29.3xvs 41.8x+30%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.