Stock comparison
Ulta Beauty
ULTA$22.53BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
VinFast Auto
VFS$8.35BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Ulta Beauty
ULTA 61 VFS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
ULTA6wins
1winsVFS
68C
F16
68C
F2
47D
F35
53D
C62
47D
F2
61C
F27
60C
F32
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ULTA | VFS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $22.53B | $8.35B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.2x | - Winner |
| EV/EBIT | 15.1x | - Winner |
| ROIC (TTM) | Winner: 22.75% | -91.45% |
| Gross margin | Winner: 39.1% | -42.53% |
| Net margin | Winner: 9.31% | -107.31% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.47% | 54.12% Winner |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 9.2% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.8x | - Winner |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ULTA leads on
- Gross margin39.1%vs -42.53%+192%
- ROIC (TTM)22.75%vs -91.45%+125%
- Net margin9.31%vs -107.31%+109%
- Market cap$22.53Bvs $8.35B+63%
VFS leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.8x+182%
- EV/EBIT-vs 15.1x+131%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 19.2x+113%
- Revenue CAGR 5y54.12%vs 9.47%+83%
More like ULTA
More like VFS
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.